https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143700
Buovjaga <ilmari.lauhakan...@libreoffice.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
| |ice.org
--- Comment #3 from Buovjaga <ilmari.lauhakan...@libreoffice.org> ---
(In reply to Colin from comment #0)
> Searching for existing bug reports is a fairly random affair.
>
> If the current searcher fails to utilise any keywords the original reporter
> identified, they rarely find a match or the potential targets incorporate
> every aspect of LO.
>
> Would it be possible to make some form of process ID available with the menu
> choices - and the context menus - and compel reporters to include that
> process ID in the brief description?
>
> Searching for CALC LOC0001 - or whatever - increases the prospect of finding
> relevant issues about a million% and could just speed the process a tad.
>
> Also, we could all find it regardless of our first language
I guess "process ID" here would be .uno: command as in
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/DispatchCommands
I don't think we could ever compel normal reporters to include such info. It is
more the area of quality assurance volunteers and staff to fine tune the data
for discoverability. Meta bugs are one way of categorising and can sometimes be
useful at a glance (Show dependency tree)
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Tracking_Bugs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
