https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152770
--- Comment #6 from Caolán McNamara <caol...@redhat.com> --- There are indeed no Resolution (or DefaultResolution) entries in that ppd file. Unlike e.g. vcl/unx/generic/printer/configuration/ppds/SGENPRT.PS The spec http://www.lprng.com/RESOURCES/PPD/5003.PPD_Spec_v4.1.pdf is basically silent on no Resolution entries one way or the other. This ppd has a comment of: *%%%% PPD file for Generic Text-Only Printer with CUPS. *%%%% Created by the CUPS PPD Compiler CUPS v2.3.1. *% (c) 2014 OpenPrinting in it and this appears to be originally named textonly.ppd. On the face of things this seems to be a ppd for an unusual edge case where a warning is justified seeing as LibreOffice is going to hope for the best and assume it can do 300x300 if forced to attempt to print to it. Though I'm interested in if you really have a (ancient?) line printer installed that can only print text, or have some virtual one installed for some deliberate reason. @stragu was the "Repro in:" for just the "invalid event combination" warning (which I think is now fixed in trunk), or do you also have a "no Resolution in ..." warning? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
