https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153899
--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg <eyalr...@gmx.com> --- So, one question here is: Q1: Should "being merged" be considered one of the formatting properties of a cell? * If it should then the clone-formatting also applies the "not merged" property, and see raal's comment #2. * If it should not - then clone-formatting should never merge nor unmerge. Now, even if "being merged" _is_ one of the formatting properties, then we face a second question: Q2: Should the clone-formatting apply to all the separating cells getting unmerged or just to the first? I believe that the answer Q2 is pretty clearly "Apply to all separating cells". I very much doubt any user would want just one unmerged cell to be affected - even if the merging is broken. As for Q1, here my opinion is less well-formed. I tend to see "mergedness" as not an apsect formatting, but a structural aspect, which should not be affected by clone formatting; but I could be convinced otherwise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
