https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125040
--- Comment #32 from Maxim Monastirsky <momonas...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Rizal Muttaqin from comment #31) > 1. It's safe to assume that the old Contextual Single can be removed? Not yet: 1. Currently only Writer has the new implementation, while Impress/Draw weren't converted yet. (Calc doesn't even have the contextual single UI to begin with - Bug 142653.) 2. Various color buttons have the problem of storing the last used color separately in each button instance, which makes the color reset each time one switches the context. This bug isn't new (reported in e.g. Bug 113433, Bug 122003 and a lot more tickets in different variations), but it becomes more visible with the new implementation. One might argue that this is a regression compared to the old Contextual Single, and we probably should attempt to fix that before making the switch. 3. Just removing the old implementation isn't enough. We need also to migrate existing users to the new implementation, as otherwise they will end up with a broken UI after upgrade. > > 1. Which naming to use for this UI? Stick to Single Toolbar or Contextual > Single? I think that "Contextual" Single was named like that to differentiate it from the "Simple" Single. As soon as we have just one single line layout, we can just call it "Single Toolbar". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
