https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132928
--- Comment #13 from Justin L <jl...@mail.com> --- So, optimal wraps text to the side with the most room for text (except in the case where it is tiny in which case it wraps parallel). Sounds like only a documentation issue to me. That definition makes perfect sense in a practical world (although from a standards perspective it is very arbitrary and should not have included the parallel aspect). Changing a default to use parallel wrap instead of optimal sounds like a bad idea to me. Rarely do you want text to wrap on both sides of something (only in the case of something centred and tiny). I suggest removing easy-hack. In fact, I suggest closing this as NOTABUG. I don't see anything actionable here. P.S. Microsoft DOES have an optimal setting. Both "tight" and "square" have a "largest only" choice. (It just doesn't do an arbitrary justify on occasion.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
