https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153721
--- Comment #21 from Jim Raykowski <rayk...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #20) > 1. There are probably good use cases for both variations (because it depends > on the content of document, including its conceptual relations, which can > change during the text production phase, which is why one wants to move > sections) ==> will be hard to justify one version over another, if there is > only going to be one form of behavior. > 2. As a user, it is useful to know what to expect (no matter which > functionality is chosen) -- which also implies clear documentation. > 3. If only one functionality is chosen, then make it the simplest one (e.g., > move heading and text to above/below the next heading, no matter what > outline level). > Reason: easy to predict what will happen. > 4. If only one section is moved, then just click multiple times to get > desired result. (not so hard) > 5. (With outline folding, I believe it is possible to move larger chunks of > text). > 6. Most important is symmetry (i.e., up and down have the same effect. In > this way, if you move something up (or down) (and do not like the result), > then you can use down (or up) to undo. > Effort to restore chapter move behavior to what it was before the patch committed to fix bug 154212 and keep comment 19 behavior from master: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/152347 > More ambitious comments.... > 7. In the modern interface, what about drag and drop in the Navigator? That > is, instead of move up/down, you can select one or more headings, and then > drag them to where you want in the outline structure. That would be ideal > (and would make move up and down irrelevant, i.e, could be removed). Chapters can be moved by drag and drop when the Navigator is in Headings Content Navigation View. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
