https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103337
--- Comment #8 from Michael Weghorn <m.wegh...@posteo.de> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7) > See also bug 70519. Michael, what do you think? Having the line thickness depend on zoom factor (as implemented in tdf#70519) generally sounds reasonable to me. Is tweaking the calculation of the line width further (to have an even better default value) potentially a solution to resolve this issue (rather than adding an extra expert option)? Or is there a need to also have a thicker line for other cases, e.g. with no scaling applied at all? In general, doing "the right thing" by default is IMHO more preferable than adding extra options (that users would then have to know about and set manually) when reasonably possible. But that obviously depends on whether or not there's a common understanding of what the "right behaviour" would be. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
