https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156816
--- Comment #8 from prrv...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #6) > In fact, you should have amended (see "amend" keyword for git) the first > patch. Thanks for all the advice, it worked perfectly. see: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/155866 (In reply to Lionel Elie Mamane from comment #7) > I would recommend to "just" resynchronise it with the values in Java JDBC, > https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/20/docs/api/java.sql/java/sql/Types. > html > or is it > https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/20/docs/api/java.sql/java/sql/ > JDBCType.html I think we can say that the SQL types are up to date with Java. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
