https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156638

Buovjaga <ilmari.lauhakan...@libreoffice.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
                   |                            |ice.org

--- Comment #3 from Buovjaga <ilmari.lauhakan...@libreoffice.org> ---
You list eight issues while a report should should only be about a single
issue. So separate reports will have to be created. However, some of the listed
issues are already covered by existing reports.

(In reply to robert from comment #0)
> When the attached ODS file is saved in HTML format, there are at least these
> issues:
> 
> 1) Excessive bloat 
> The resulting HTML file has a size in excess of 10Mb, and part of this is
> caused by
> 
> a) Excessive indentation of the generated HTML - there should be a setting
> to manage this, IN THE SAVE-AS DIALOGUE, and not is some obscure settings
> dialogue that your average Tammy, Danny, or Harriet will never look at

Possibly covered by bug 128638.

> b) Inclusion of utterly useless data, in casu the "sdval" and "sdnum"
> attributes. They serve abso-(strong expletive)-ingly no purpose in a html
> document, and in my case the 2057 is quite likely something Windoze
> specific, even worse...

Bug 60071 comment 4 addresses this, but for export this could possibly be
covered by bug 128638.

> c) Lack of additional CSS, even just three selectors, .l, .c, and .r for
> "text-align: left/center/right" would save considerable space, 'class="l"'
> saves three chars over 'align="left"' Setting a default alignment for *all*
> tables would result in (potentially) substantial additional savings.

It is about Writer, but bug 95861 could possibly cover this, if the end result
is a bigger rework of HTML handling.

> 2) Navigation
> a) Given that each sheet ends up in a sequentially numbered table, how hard
> would it be to add backward and forward links to each of them, and an "up"
> link to get back to the index?

Requested in bug 106656.

> b) If the top-row of a sheet is (a) frozen (heading), why not add something
> like
>  
>  .sticky {
>         position: sticky;
>         top: 0;
>         width: fit-content;
>       }
> 
>       html {
>         scroll-padding-top: 3rem;
>       }
> 
> to it, so that the same effect is achieved in the html

Could not find existing report.

> 3) Why are the html anchor tags in UPPERCASE???

Pretty cosmetic, but could not find existing report.

> 4) How hard would it be to use the name of the ODS file in the <title> tag,
> when the create and modified dates are already used in (what are
> essentially) useless meta tags?

Could not find existing report.

> 5) What the flippin' 'ell are the colgroup tags for? They do not stop some
> cells from flowing into the next row, or let me rephrase that, THEY ACTUALLY
> CAUSE CELLS TO WRAP! 

Possibly covered by bug 128638.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to