https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158958
--- Comment #14 from ady <adylo811...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #11) > (In reply to ady from comment #9) > > Yes it does make your objections invalid--UX decision was made for bug > 153106 and a revert of the bug 91415 zoom responsive triangle marking for > comments remains, and yes you have harped on it repeatedly with no traction > for a revisit, frankly annoyingly so. Deciding something doesn't make facts and objective points to be false. You still have such prerogative of deciding something, but, as this new report shows, it doesn't invalidate anything. There were no reasons given for the decision (in the reports themselves nor in the relevant mailing lists), just that a decision was made. Since developers actually recognized that they didn't care to read the points I made (but kept asking the same things repeatedly), it couldn't be that annoying – they just ignored the posts. The questions I was asked to repeatedly explain in absurd extreme detail the problem and the proposed alternatives back then just show the clear difference between developing code for Calc and being an actual user. The distortion and personal trashing are much annoying. Although re-purposing this ticket derails the matter in question (again), let's see if at least something positive comes out; I'll mark this post as OT with that hope. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
