https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158545
--- Comment #5 from Telesto <tele...@surfxs.nl> --- Created attachment 191729 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=191729&action=edit Image sample (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2) > Agree, the ratio should be kept. But what could be an alternative label for > the original size? Maybe something like: Reset dimensions. Which acts at fit to page (proportional) for large image dimensions; in other cases the embedded dimensions are used (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4) > Miklos, Mike: any insights why Writer prevents to exceed the page size? Well not directed to me... but for the record: I surely don't want to be inserted or reset to actual dimensions. Images are often stored at 72 dpi with 16 megapixels or more. Result: insanely large images dimensions (based on DPI). The 'original size' button shouldn't do this either, IMHO. It's not useful/sensible/practical, if you ask me Draw example 1. Insert the attached image into draw (image shrinks to page on insertion; fine) 2. You can increase the size by stretching it with the corners of the image (page size is not a hard limit in Draw, it is in Writer: annoying) 3. Right click the image -> Select Original size (unpractical end-result) So insertion: fit to page (proportionally) for large images, in other cases else embedded size (across the board; Writer, Impress, Draw, Calc) The Writer page size shouldn't be hard limit, ideally. However the current behaviour isn't to problematic. My primary concerns: (a) Images losing proportions (b) the label not matching what it actually does in case of Writer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.