https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158740

Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Regression By|Miklos Vajna                |Noel Grandin
                 CC|                            |noelgran...@gmail.com
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |NEW
            Version|7.6.0.0 alpha0+             |7.3.0.0.alpha1+

--- Comment #7 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
<stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org> ---
(In reply to Miklos Vajna from comment #5)
> Tables are not meant to work in footnotes in general (e.g. if you go to the
> footnote, then Table -> Insert Table is gray for a reason), but I appreciate
> the creativity to still try to get it there with a paste. :-)
You can't underestimate the users' drive to achieve what they want! :D

(In reply to Miklos Vajna from comment #6)
> Hmm, if I remove the floating table from the bugdoc, I can still reproduce
> the crash, which is odd, given the above bisect result.
> 
> Could you please check if this reduced document ever worked?
Thanks for the smaller reproducer! Indeed, 7.5.9 also crashes with the same
comment 3 steps, with a nearly-identical trace:
https://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/crash_details/b7b9a571-3393-4bdb-9d65-2a5be5b882ba
7.4 as well:
https://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/crash_details/62b328c8-b305-421f-ac63-5b8f64fcac9b
And 7.3:
https://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/crash_details/c5283c40-1271-44c9-be9d-19ede57c4449

With the same std::out_of_range in console.

No repro in 7.2.0.4.

Bibisected with linux-64-7.3 repo to first bad build
[4c1aa7dd9e977998037a56dc7a503f2c4b24385d] which points to:

commit  ec1c4c49301758c54394f9943252e192ad54638b
author  Noel Grandin Mon Nov 22 14:08:27 2021 +0200
committer       Noel Grandin Tue Nov 23 14:00:08 2021 +0100
O[U]String::replaceAt overloads that take string_view
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/125657

Noel, can you please have a look? This is using attachment 191777 with comment
3 steps.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to