https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158835
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda
| |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
| |7863
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC| |stephane.guillou@libreoffic
| |e.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Blocks| |108014, 103369
URL| |https://ask.libreoffice.org
| |/t/direct-formatting-of-lis
| |t-symbols/99731
--- Comment #4 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu)
<stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org> ---
Direct formatting bypassing list bullets or numbers is expected, for when the
user selects several paragraphs at once (the bullets/numbers being inside the
selection) and changing the direct formatting. I think most users would expect
this to only affect the text and not the bullets/numbers.
Regardless, you are here talking about a case when the selection only includes
the bullet. I can see your method in
https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/direct-formatting-of-list-symbols/99731/7
requires the user to have a selection of _the next_ bullet/number in order to
change the direct formatting of a bullet/number.
The first thing to do is sort out this oddity of having to select a different
thing to what we want to change, in bug 158879.
Anyway, reproduced in recent trunk build: changing the marker's character style
from "Numbering Symbols" to "None" in the sample's 3rd list restores the green
colour.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103369
[Bug 103369] [META] Bullet, numbered, and outline list bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108014
[Bug 108014] [META] Writer character style bugs and enhancements
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
