> We are not speaking about putting *only* the timestamp(s) as > *only* identifier, only to give them as an added information for human > convenience, not as things scripts would use as unique identifier.
That is exactly the point. Quoting a previous answer to Norbert "> it is less reliable and at best redundant with the git-sha... Redundant is good! Especially if the redundant information can be understood by non-technical users ;)" This is not a SHA vs Timestamp discussion. It is a simple "Please Add both" Peace! -- Pedro _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
