Hi klaus-jürgen, all They get their own credit points as you can see on the credit list. It > won't be a direct QA point but it is a counting one.
Well, then that list needs to be updated more frequently so that people actually see their name on it after a new release (I find it a little absurd that the LibreOffice wiki contributors' credits are under developers who never contributed to LO... Anyone who did a single commit (even a thousand) back in 2000 is not an LO contributor. IMO that section should be removed altogether. E.g. on German ml there are many discussions about potential bugs. Some > line in a bug report, some are user defined problems. The different people > on list try out the descriped problems and discuss them. So people do QA > but it is really uncatchable and uncountable as even all contributions on > the mls. > Can't the German ML community "elect" someone who has a reasonable English to report the findings in Bugzilla? He/she could register as "German ML users" and at least there would be a group credit. It seems to me like a waste of good resources if that testing and discussion stays in the ML unreported because of a language barrier... Regards, Pedro
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
