Hi Guys, can we have a decision in this matter?
Do we/you need more information/ more time - or is it just different heart feelings? Shall we make an operational tradeoff by defining a test period of, say, one year? For me, the matter itself is not that important, I can arrange with both procedures, but I'd really like to test Bjoerns hypothesis of community empowerment ;-) So, please, for meritocratic reasons, Bjoern and Rainer, I believe it's up to you to decide. (Or is ESC or whatever tdf Board the right gremium? I don't know) Thanks, Nino PS - just one thing: > (*) You should never think of QA as "I", even if it sometimes feels that > way: It will be a selffulfilling prophecy and hamper community growth. or - to say it positive: Think of QA as * qualified constructive feedback for the devs and * important contribution to enhance and sustain quality and thus acceptance of the software _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
