On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 12:57 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > I did a quick query concerning LibO Bugs with "somehow patch" > attachments [1] and still UNFIXED, hat might show that these patches > still wait for review or something else went wrong > > What shell we do with these 60 bugs?
Yep - so; I reviewed all the outstanding bugs with a 'patch' boolean set to true/1 - and the majority are patches that were abhortive / proof-of-concept / and shouldn't be merged. I guess I should prolly have flagged them with some 'notpatch' keyword ;-) or adjusted them in some way. I pushed the real ones to the mailing list and/or merged / closed them. The real trick is to push new patch bugs to the dev. list I think and/or thoughts on how to annotate / improve the query appreciated. I also didn't quest for patches that were not marked as such but files ending '.diff' or '.patch' - perhaps there are some there (if there is an easy-to-use query for me to review those that'd be great ;-). Thanks, Michael. -- michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/