On Sat, 2012-06-02 at 08:54 +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Ah, that's very different. So essentially people that now have > immediate gratification^W commit rights would "go back" to "one day > delay"?
Nah - as Bjoern says this is only for non-trivial patches that the reviewer is not confident about and that would prolly benefit from a day of delay to allow a specialist in the given area to jump in and do the work; clearly interacting / forwarding to the right person etc. is a good idea here. > something to the effect: "one day waiting period is a lot for eager > new contributors". I think I thought this was about requests to apply > a commit *already* in master to stable branch. Heh ;-) it's about the above subset of patches that some are worried about going into master without enough review. Lets see how the gerrit flow helps as/when it comes. What I hated wrt. the CWS process was it's huge amount of round-trips. If there is a sausage machine that (as a committer) I can choose to push to, that after building on <n> platforms auto-pushes that to master, I'd be dead pleased. It means I can do more risky cross-platform changes more quickly, and queue them up back to back - knowing I'm not going to bust other people's builds ;-) Of course, if we start finding new contributors' patches taking much longer to merge, we should re-visit ;-) IIRC we decided to re-discuss this at a later date. HTH, Michael. -- michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/