Petr Mladek píše v Po 03. 09. 2012 v 18:41 +0200: > > > 4. Do 3.7.0-RCs every week (use the original schedule). There is not > > > enough time for feedback => demotivating for QA. > > After all, this is still good solution. We released, 3.5 and 3.6 this > way and it somehow worked. The .0 release is always hectic and we get > many fixes every week, so the two weeks delay between rc2 and rc3 would > be too long.
After all we used something close to this. The schedule is: + Week 2: 3.7.0-rc1 + Week 3: + Week 4: 3.7.0-rc2 + Week 5: 3.7.0-rc3 + Week 6: 3.7.0-release + Week 7: + Week 8: 3.7.1-rc1 + Week 9: 3.7.1-rc2 + Week 10: 3.7.1-release + Week 11: 3.7.2-rc1 + Week 12: + Week 13: 3.7.2-rc2 + Week 14: 3.7.2-release + Week 15: 3.7.3-rc1 + Week 16: + Week 17: 3.7.4-rc2 + Week 18: 3.7.4-release By other words, I moved 3.7.0-rc3 and 3.7.1.rc1 and created space between them. It is not ideal but we will do it better in the future releases. See also https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan Best Regards, Petr _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/