On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 04:24:09PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > * Present: > + propose new Difficulty: DifficultyHard
Eek, multiple questions on that: - What would be the difference to "DifficultyInteresting" in hard and objective terms? - How do we make sure we would all judge the EasyHack the same way as either "DifficultyBeginner", "DifficultyInteresting" and "DifficultyHard"? If we cant sufficiently safely make the second answer a "yes" without generating a huge wikipage describing the process of judging an EasyHack in an objective manner, the finegrained classification is worthless as it will be inconsistent. If we need a huge wikipage, a/ we have already lost b/ we have hours of bikeshedding on that in front of us. > AI: + add/adapt the wiki page / generation scripts (Bjoern) Rejecting, and invoking "you touch it, you own it" on Michael. ;) Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
