On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Roman Eisele <qali...@eikota.de> wrote:
> Hi all, > > recently I noticed that some of us start actually using the “QA Contact” > field, which was neglected for a long time. So I think I must have missed > something. Is there now a consensus, or a tendency towards a consensus, > that we actually should use the “QA Contact” field? Should I put myself > (actually, my mail address ;-) into that field if I “take” a bug for QA, > i.e. when I feel as the (most) responsible bugwrangler for a particular > bug? I will be happy to do so, I just want to know if this is recommended > now ... > > Thank you for any hints, and best regards -- > > Roman > I will assign my name to the QA if I am actively working the ticket. or if I am researching the issue more. This will let others know the ticket is being look into by the QA hope this helps -- -- Masekela Walls Web Security Analyst | Senior Server Administrator Powserve.com / Gemini ISP Networks
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/