Hi Petr, all
Petr Mladek wrote > We listen :-) Well, the testing can be done even with Dev builds. I know you do listen. The problem is that I don't have the knowledge and (most of the time) you don't have the time to act upon it ;) I already did a similar thing under Windows (renamed the profile from \3 to \4) and everything worked as expected. Petr Mladek wrote > The only problem I found was Tools/Options/LibreOffice/Appearance > because there are named schemes (LibreOffice vs. LoDev). Well, this can > be tested as well if you create your own scheme. This just proves my point that *full* early testing is important ;) Petr Mladek wrote > So this testing is needed only once every few > years. And therefore even more important/sensitive ;) Unless TDF decides to do a "Google/Mozilla" version scheme and this will become monthly :) Petr Mladek wrote > Another solution would be to build 4.0-betas with release > configuration. I guess that it can be installed in parallel with LO-3 > even on Windows because it uses another prefix, ... How does that > sound? What do you mean "release configuration"? Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-minutes-of-ESC-call-tp4020292p4021049.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
