Hi Michael
Michael Meeks-2 wrote >> BTW the build organization improved a lot. Well done! > > So you're generally happy with the change ? [ it'd be nice to avoid the > back-compat symlinks if that works for everyone since they'd clutter the > top-level with two inter-mingled un-related concepts: branch and > build-system if possible ]. I am very happy with that particular change. Actually if someone asked QA people I think that it could be improved. As Rainer suggested in the Website topic, it could have two paths 1) daily\by_OS\by_branch and 2) daily\by_branch\by_OS TBH the previous organization by machine was really the worst :) I have asked Norbert to rename the W2008R2 machine but he hasn't got into it Michael Meeks-2 wrote > I'm sorry you feel that way: for me developers includes people doing > the critical job of QA; I'd use 'hackers' for people doing the coding - > not sure what Florian means. Yes, that is exactly how those comments from the Chairman of the Board of Directors of TDF make me feel. Obviously the devs need to make the changes to the tinderboxes but a little bit of dialog would be nice... I believe that is how you build a community. Otherwise it's a developer driven project and everybody else either fits in our gets out. Best regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Dailies-by-branch-tp4022879p4023127.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/