On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.cz> wrote: >> Taking the 3.6 branch as an example, the first release came out by Aug >> 12th., after which point there were no new major/minor builds until >> 4.0 was released just after 3.6.5 in February. That means that for 6 >> months, the 3.6 branch was our most up-to-date release. That also >> means (if I understand correctly) that we didn't ship any new features >> for 6 months. Is that correct? > > Yes, it is correct. I have just tried to slightly improve > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#Summary and > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#Schedule
Looking good. > You might want to read [...a bunch of stuff...] > So much to read! :-) I've read a bit of that, but I'll try to find time to read more of that soon when I take a break from updating wiki pages... Regarding the EOL date, I've mocked-up an example of how we could display it on the wiki page: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Talk:ReleasePlan#Draft:_Adding_EOL_to_the_table (I grabbed the date from the image; Petr's date was Aug 14, 2013, which also sounds fine to me) --R _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
