Hi qubit (do you prefer Robinson?) and joel
jmadero wrote >> Together, I think that we can improve both the Ask site and QA, and >> make the LibreOffice support system a less scary and more responsive >> experience for our users. > > I completely agree with this - perhaps some basic tutorials are in > demand, walkthroughs of how to use FDO and how to use Ask properly. > Maybe documentation can help us there, else we can tackle it ourselves. I agree that both Ask and QA need more people and need to be more user friendly. In addition I think there are questions beings asked and answered (in short duplicated) because there are too many channels (mail, forum, ask) but too little people. I don't have any idea how to improve this... IMO if we need documentation/wiki/instructions then the tool is wrong. It needs to be intuitive and user friendly (Ask could easily be more user friendly, bugzilla is a nightmare). Following the logic of a famous scientist "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" (Albert Einstein), I would say that "If you need to explain it, then it's not simple enough" :) Just my 2 cents ;) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Ask-How-can-we-interoperate-with-QA-and-Bugzilla-tp4049799p4050070.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
