On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.cz> wrote: > Robinson Tryon píše v Pá 19. 04. 2013 v 17:21 -0400: > > 6 months sounds fine to me for most of the bugfix releases. > > Well, I would suggest to leave either the last bugfix release or some > generic version, e.g. 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 longer time. We want to keep the > version flag on the oldest affected version. It might be handy to have > the old version to correctly mark the old bugs that were not reported in > time.
So how about: "De-list release in Bugzilla 6 months after EOL, and leave a generic X.x version in its place" ? That also gives us a quick way to query for bugs that were reported after EOL, which might be something that we find interesting. > I mentioned in some older mail that people still use old version even 1 > year after the release. > > The generic version 3.3, 3.4, 3.5 might be better because it will be > clear that it means the code line and not a precise version. +1 Rainer, how does this plan sound to you? --R _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
