Hi All, This is a general problem that I think we shoudl just talk a bit about. If we confirm a bug on 4.1 but it's fixed in 4.2 master - what status is appropriate? Usually WFM is good but it's hard to tell a user "so it'll be broken for the foreseeable future but by 4.2 release you'll be good to go"
The bug in question isn't major at all (fdo#65550) but looking for opinions. Tracking down the appropriate patch could take a lot of time so the option is: 1. New - try to track down patch but acknowledge that this takes us away from other tasks 2. WFM - with a note to user that "in a few months it'll be fixed for you" 3 .?? Best, Joel -- *Joel Madero* LibreOffice QA Volunteer jmadero....@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
