Hi Pedro, I think it is not needed any special justification in this case, even I don't like some linked people.
Really I do not understand the concerns. Food for thought usually is good. IMMHO there are concerns that should be, as it is so few work to look for in the QA email. Or how the main job for QA team is to deal with the ... list of bugs. Or when I have posted relevant comments and questions in the QA scope, and seems no one care about them or maybe someone care who knows?. Regards. Miguel Ángel. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Food-for-thought-tp4061338p4061552.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
