On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 5:44 AM, Mateusz Zasuwik <mzasu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The only thing I imply is that new major release is enhanced by > useless formats. These files are dead, they come from dead software > and in bugzilla system you won't find even one bugreport relevant to!
And notheless someone bothered to work at it, produce some code, tested it and integrated it... and in a way that does not make the world a masive pain for the rest of the dev, like binfilter was. In open source things do not happen because pleanty of persons 'want' something, but because at least one person _does_ something. > Linux is alive platform and encrypted ODF files are in common usage. > It would be great if elementary functionality just works instead of > adding features no one needed. At least someone needed it... otherwise that person would not have written it to start with. > > More visible? Apart from this, I asked people on IRC channel > (libreoffice-dev) to glance at this issue. [...] "Second one: "yeah! ask them (developers) to give you back your > money". can you pin point the approximate date.. I have a fairly complete log, but I cannot find such exchange in libreoffice-dev That is generally not the tone in libreoffice-dev... especially not out of the blue... > > You fix it in 15 minutes? Great! So now many people can just wait next > half of year to 4.2 release. Thanks a lot for attention. No, they will have to wait until 4.1.1, which is what... 3 weeks from now? Norbert _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/