On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Robert Großkopf <rob...@familiegrosskopf.de > wrote:
> Hi Mas, > >> > > > > I viewed your attachment again . The screen shot was presented in > > English and if you notice under the general tab. The list goes from > > A-Z -- alignment being the first and background color being next. > > This is called alphabetical order from A-Z > > > > I checked under releases 4.1.03 and 4.1.04 Window and Linux. They are > > setup the same way. > > > > > > see attached from my version , We can possibly file this under a feature > > request instead of a bug > > Your attachment doesn't show the whole field-properties of a form in > base I presented. I'm not interested into a long discussion and writing > down all the properties here. But I have written the part you have > attached: > > 1 Alignment > 2 Background color > 3 Border > 4 Border color > 5 Default text > 6 Password character > 7 Visible > 8 Enabled > 9 Font > 10 Height > 11 Help Text > 12 Hide selection > 13 Label Field > 14 Text lines end with > 15 Max. text length > > That is the order of your screenshot. I put it into Calc and let it > order in alphabethical form: > > 1 Alignment > 2 Background color > 3 Border > 4 Border color > 5 Default text > 8 Enabled > 9 Font > 10 Height > 11 Help Text > 12 Hide selection > 13 Label Field > 15 Max. text length > 6 Password character > 14 Text lines end with > 7 Visible > > That is the alphabethical order of Calc. The first five fields are > ordered alphabethical. So please don't close a bug with the argument the > order is alphabetical, if it isn't. Say it is chaotically and I love > chaotically LO - and if many people of this list will aggree it might be > OK (for alle the people, who loves chaos, not for people, who will work > with software). Then I wouldn't open the bug again and will leave this > projekt. > Alphabetical order isn't an argument. The changing of the order by > groups (Anchor together with Height and Width and Positionx and > PositionY for example) to no order is a regression in usability. I think > nobody has changed this behavior from LO 4.0 to LO 4.1 with this > intention. There has been changed something at another point and nobody > noticed, that this would change the usability of the editing of > form-fields. > > Robert > > I will research this further and reply to the bug ticket. Thanks -- -- Mas
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/