I agree with you. actually I'm doing critical review to get rid of
some bugs that became WFM, bugs that do not really represent a MAB
etc. etc. and move to the 4.0mab only those bugs which really deserve it.
.....
I think that all this MAB per branch procedure should be reinvented
together
with the devs - the question is how to get their attention to help
users by
fixing major and annoying issues, even by slowing down introduction
of new
features.
We got the go ahead to merge them into one tracker to avoid future
transitions. This being said let's finish this transition (thanks Tommy
for your great work here) and I said by 4.2 we'd have some new QA
procedure/guidelines to deal with MAB - adding to agenda for next call -
thoughts welcome and appreciated :)
Best,
Joel
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
