bfoman wrote > Input is fire and forget type of site, which helps to find out hot issues > and is triggered from within Firefox.
Interesting. Someone/something (word filter?) has to read it though :) bfoman wrote > I can write that I do not want to work with anonymous bug reports while > triaging. We need that users be active considering their bugs - help to > recheck in a debug build (when there was one available in the past) or > latest release, deliver a test file, write more about steps to reproduce - > Bugzilla offers that. Once registered - you, or others in the bug's cc > list, know what is going on with the issue. I agree that anonymous bug reports are of little use (and invites spammers). But providing a valid email should be enough for all that. It should not be required to create an account. In addition the Bugzilla form is for geeks. I am allowed to say that because I have used it extensively and for a long time. Even BSA is NOT user friendly. People from UX should test it and improve it. Starting with removing the registration step. Just ask for a valid email. My 2 cents. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Where-should-users-report-bugs-tp4081505p4081548.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
