On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Robinson Tryon <bishop.robin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:05 AM, Norbert Thiebaud <nthieb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> The devs really like lo# (as it gives them more room in commit >>> messages), >> >> Yeah, and it is the dev that have to type it a lot, no ? > > Sure -- and people on the Ask site, and QA people in FDO...err.... > <insert abbreviation here>, etc..
sure but the dev need to use the canonical abbreviation because we have bot that use them to detect association between commit and bugs that is not the case on Ask for instance > "Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO" => "Joel, go take a look > at regressions on LO" > "Joel, go take a look at regressions on FDO" => "Joel, go take a look > at regressions on LOBZ" How many place could one possibly be looking for 'regression' ... what confusing meaning lo could have in this context... beside you could use libreoffice bugzilla or 'salt mines' in that context it would not matter much... it is human to human interractions... the issue is that dev have to put stuff in their commit message to talk to Bot so one cannot be as creative there :-) Norbert _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
