Hi, On Thu, Feb 06, 2014 at 06:38:36AM -0800, Joel Madero wrote: > I don't think an upper limit is going to solve the problem that users are > quickly figuring out our secret behind the scenes action and think that it's > the fastest way to get their own bugs fixed.
There is no "secret behind the scenes action". > At this point I think it's not much better than users knowing how to mess > around with priority/severity - one user was one step away from being blocked > for a day because he had put 3-5 of his own bugs on there, still in > unconfirmed status, 2 of which were done after I had asked him to stop with > the first ones. Well, taking shortcuts and Doing-it-wrong(tm) obviously should not be rewarded. A MAB should be properly reported, triaged, bibisected etc. before being added to the MABs. But there absolutely is nothing secret or behind the scenes about that. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
