On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Joel Madero <jmadero....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > As I missed the last call I'm not sure if this was discussed but another > developer has pleaded that QA change the wording to something else > (nothing related to EasyHack) - I think that this is perfectly fine and > have a suggestion "NeedsCodePointers."
"Code Pointers" could be confusing, because pointers exist in C++ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointer_(computer_programming) I'm seeing some confusion in how 'NeedAdvice' is used as well, so for our Whiteboard tags let's: 1) Pick something that's very clear 2) Write up rules on proper use My understand was that "ProposedEasyHack" was just that: A non-developer (or a developer who didn't have experience w/the relevant section of code) was suggesting that a particular bug be classified as an EasyHack. Perhaps something like NeedsDevEval? (as we need both a difficulty eval, plus additional EasyHack-related whiteboard tags, plus pointers to the right place to stack fixing this bug) Best, --R _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/