On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 08:19 -0700, m.a.riosv wrote: > Hi, > perhaps only two digits could be a bit short, IMO three can be a more > balanced option, because it has a good correspondence with public releases.
Yeah, I think I'd be happy with this. Also, part of the problems comes from the total-unsorted-ness of version items in the query page. For instance, * 3.5.1 release is followed by 3.4.6 RC1 * 4.2.00alpha0+Master comes between 4.1.0.0alpha1 and 4.1.0.0beta1 (the reason why I missed it) * "3.3 all versions" comes after "3.6.7.1 rc" * "4.3.0.0alpha0+Master" comes between "4.2.0.0beta1" and "4.2.0.0beta2" and so on. Anyway, it appears that one can use a regular expression to filter versions, which I was previously looking for but didn't realize it was under the "Custom Search" section. I can just use that to make it fit my workflow. Thanks, Kohei _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
