On 09/05/14 16:01, Italo Vignoli wrote: > On 08/05/14 17:29, Michael Meeks wrote: > >> * Should we simplify version numbering? (Kendy) >> + So far major.minor.micro, but due to our release plan, all our versions >> are continuous improvements - does it make sense to still keep 'major'? >> [ ie. should we do 4.3.0 -> 5.0, 4.4.3 -> 6.3, etc.? ] > > Marketing wise, this should be carefully prepared, as otherwise it would > become a real problem for users (and also for journalists). They have > just become accustomed to this release numbering and to the fast pace of > time based releases, and the risk is that they would not understand why > we are changing. >
well the main question discussed was whether there were any technical reasons to avoid changing the versioning, whether it's actually _desirable_ to do it is purely a marketing decision. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
