On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Joel Madero <jmadero....@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> ConfirmedRegression >>> >>> Description: Is used if a bug is confirmed to be a regression. >> why do we need this, given that we have a "regression" keyword? this is >> a pointless alias... developers don't search for it, the ESC bug-stats >> script doesn't know about it... fortunately currently only 2 bugs have it. > Moving to not in use - agreed regression keyword is sufficient.
AFAIK the only reason we use 'regression' in the keyword field instead of the whiteboard is that FDO happens to have 'regression' set as a keyword. To simplify our learning curve for QA, we should make a push for consistency. (we can make a decision here after bugzilla migration) --R -- Robinson Tryon LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald Senior QA Bug Wrangler The Document Foundation qu...@libreoffice.org _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
