On Thu, 2014-10-30 at 20:00 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > My suggestions : > + fix bug fdo#85215 : done > + change the default value of option UpdateReferenceOnSort from true > to false for backward compatibility
So - we punted this default decision to the UX team. > Main bug reports related to this problem: My concern is that I don't have time to waste with interminable ranting bug comments by all & sundry ;-) or lists of duplicates, or "change default to this / that" - all of that is in-hand, and it is a ~one-liner to change the default now [ and perhaps a single unit test change ]. The only open question is: given what is in master today - are there -well-defined- clearly specified cases that continue not to work [ with the default set to the user's preferred state ]. Are there clear comparisons vs. what competing products do in exactly those corner cases too ? Can we get a tracker for exactly these outstanding issues and no others ? can each of those issues be a succinct, crisp, clear statement of a real issue with the current state of master; and nothing else =) or (more ideally) we can confirm that there are no outstanding issues [ modulo the non-interesting ones I outline above ]. Thanks ! Michael. -- michael.me...@collabora.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/