On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 07:54:02 +0100, Joel Madero <jmadero....@gmail.com>
wrote:
On 11/11/2014 10:42 PM, Tommy wrote:
....
my proposal is to ping:
UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 100 days
http://snipurl.com/29ejxgd (183 bugs)
I am not a fan at all for pinging unconfirmed bugs . . . already too
many people leave comments like "please confirm on x.x.x.x - for a user
to continue to be testing their own bugs when QA hasn't touched them
beyond asking them to continue testing is just a good way to annoy the
hell out of users. 100 days is also very short time frame (183 bugs is
nearly 25% of our total count).
NEW bugs older than 2 years (*)
http://snipurl.com/29febjl (439 bugs)
I am much more a fan of this.
Best,
Joel
Ok. let's go ahead with the old NEW bugs (nice oxymoron).
I suggest waiting a few days after the incoming release of LibO 4.3.4
before running this ping.
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
