On 27.01.2015 08:12, Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Tommy <ba...@quipo.it> wrote: >> +1. we really need to remove a lot of those useless keywords > > Here's the current list of keywords: > > ALL: What should go? > > ---- > > bisected (255) > The bug has been successfully connected to a code commit that > introduced the bug (such as with "git bisect").
useful, keep > bisect_pending (0) > The bug seems likely to benefit from bisecting, (such as easy to > reproduce, etc.), but the bisect has not yet been performed. See also > the "bisected" keyword. this sounds similar to BibisectRequest - which one to keep? > cleanup0407 (2) > April 2007 bug cleanup. DELETE > have-backtrace (232) > bugs that have a useful backtrace useful, keep > i18n (26) > Xorg Internationalisation issues (i18n) sounds potentially useful, we don't have a "component" with similar scope (but if we keep it the description needs to remove "Xorg" and it should be merged with "l10" as they seem very similar) > janitor (9) > Cleanup bugs, usually trivial. sounds like EasyHack? DELETE > l10n (51) > Xorg/X11 Localisation issues see "i18n" above > licence (2) > Files with licence problems (e.g. mixing incompatible licences, > missing/non-permissive copyrights, et al) not sure if we want this, best to get BoD's opinion on that... > love (8) > Marking a bug with this keyword means that you're willing to help > someone fix the bug, or that it should be fixable by a beginner > without any help. This should ONLY be set by a maintainer or people > familiar with the code base, and ONLY when it looks like a project > suitable for a new developer looking for a task. covered by EasyHack -> DELETE > movetoxkc (0) > Bugs that should be moved to xkeyboard-config, if still applicable. DELETE > NEEDINFO (51) > The bug does not have enough information in order to solve the > problem. Please read the comments and add the relevant information > required to aid in solving the problem. this is a status, so doesn't need to be a keyword too? > notourbug (2) > It's not really our bug, but we might work around it anyway. RESOLVED NOTOURBUG -> DELETE? > patch (21) > Bugs with a valid patch. the patch attachment should have the "patch" flag set which can be queried so why do we need this? > regression (3392) > Xorg bug regressions (issues previously fixed but somehow broken again) keep the all-time favorite, remove "Xorg" from description though > security (6) > Security-sensitive bugs sure, let's keep them in the public bug tracker :D > want-backtrace (13) > Bugs whose triage could be greatly accelerated with the addition of a > backtrace from the crash. hmm sounds like it could be useful... > x12 (0) > Bugs that require a protocol version bump. DELETE >> and add some [keywords] >> that are nore useful. > > We have a number of "tags" that we put in the Whiteboard right now > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard > (also see advanced page) > > Many of those could become keywords. > > ALL: Proposals on which ones? "confirmedRegression" never served any purpose and should be summarily DELETED "possibleRegression" could be a keyword, unless it's considered too transient a state... is that a criterion? hmmm... why not just add it... "confirmed:VERSION:OS" "noRepro:VERSION:OS" "needsSOFTWARE" "needsHARDWARE" "target:X.Y" "summary:comment#" are not fixed so cannot be keyword "bibisected" should be keyword "odf" and "odf_validation" should be keywords "a11y" sounds useful as a keyword "perf" sounds useful as a keyword "interoperability" could be a keyword too, although perhaps a better name is required that indicates this is about Microsoft Office and its formats in particular ("MSOinterop"? "MSO"? "MSinterop"? "MSOffice"?). there are *lots* of easy-hack related ones... not sure about those? perhaps better leave them in the whiteboard since we may often add additional ones etc. and the keyword list may become cluttered? _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
