On 01/29/2015 04:01 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:13:18PM -0800, Joel Madero wrote: >> I agree that it would be good & it is possible. I highly recommend we >> create a new product "bugzilla" where we can easily track these >> enhancement requests...else they are likely to get lost in the abyss. > Nope. Bugzilla is Infra. Infra is on Redmine. Lets not make exceptions to > exceptions. Its already complicated enough.
I've never been a fan of this split to begin with. Having a much less visible means of suggesting enhancement requests or bugs pretty much just sucks. Just speaking for myself, I'm very unlikely to report any enhancement requests about bugzilla on redmine... > see: https://redmine.documentfoundation.org/issues/1055#note-1 > > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/TDF-bugzilla-bug-report-td4137958.html > > Still, creating enhancement suggestions _if_ they are reasonably ressourced, > or > the reporter commits him/herself to it is of course great. But that has to > happen on Redmine. So we're only tracking enhancement requests if the reporter can either (1) do it themselves; or (2) they can show that it's reasonably resourced? I can't imagine a similar strategy working for LibreOffice itself - we might as well close 99% of enhancement requests. I don't get why we'd have two different "philosophies" just because one is "infra" and the other is .... something else? Best, Joel _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
