Robinson Tryon wrote:
Hi all,

As mentioned in the ESC call, it could be helpful to add a new
Bugzilla Status that encompasses bugs that have been abandoned/don't
have enough data.

=> What type of bugs would this cover?

* User isn't willing to share private document with anyone, and we
can't reproduce


if the user don't wanna share data where we can reproduce his/her bug it's not a valid bug report.... anonymizing strategies are described in the wiki to hide sensible data so there's no real excuse not to share files.


* Bug sits in NEEDINFO status for 6+ months
* (other situations?)

...


if the user don't wanna provide additional infos after 6 months of waiting this is not a valid bug report...

consider that after 6 month you receive a NEEDINFO ping giving you an extra month to give infos before being labeled as INVALID, so that's 7 months of waiting, a timeframe which should be enough to provide a valid answer to many question

> => Reasoning:
>
> * We currently mark abandoned bugs as RESOLVED WORKSFORME, or RESOLVED
> INVALID, but an additional Status value could help us be more precise
> in indicating why a bug has been set aside.
> * An additional Status would allow us to be more diplomatic with tough
> users, and avoid the potential negatives of "INVALID" or "WORKS FOR
> ME" on such bugs


I think we should keep labeling those as INVALID

IMHO the time spent to implement this new ABANDONED/EXPIRED/WHATEVERstate will be almost useless...

in both cases the fault of the bug closure is the reporting user
so I really do not care at all being diplomatic with people who don't provide necessary informations.

just my 2 cents



_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Reply via email to