I did just a few minutes of digging: Here are bugs marked as regressions but not with anything regarding bibisect (bibisectRequest, bibisected, or notBibisectable) (*147 bugs*)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?keywords=regression&keywords_type=allwords&list_id=573832&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&status_whiteboard=bibisect&status_whiteboard_type=notregexp bibisectRequests: *138 bugs* (125 of which are tagged as regressions correctly) https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?list_id=573835&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&status_whiteboard=bibisectRequest&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr We have 668 bugs tagged as regression - that means that over 40% of our regressions *need additional work by QA*. This is pretty telling info as far as I'm concerned. Best, Joel _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
