Hola Miguel Ángel
m.a.riosv wrote > Please could someone take a look to the attached test, perhaps I'm > misinterpreting how wildcards works. You are right, there is definitely a bug in LibreOffice implementation of Wildcards One comment: the last pattern has a redundancy, a question mark before an asterisk is the same as simply the asterisk. E.g. *c?*1 is the same as *c*1 I suggest that for the bug report in the sample file you add an extra column with the expected results as values so that it is easier to see what is wrong. BTW If anyone is interested in testing this new feature (under Windows 10, at least) the only Master builds that do run are the x86 from TB39 Best regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Testing-Release-Notes-5-2-Support-wildcards-to-be-compatible-with-XLS-XLSX-and-with-ODF-1-2-tp4181736p4181759.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/