Hi all
We currently have 3 metas that use our deprecated, subjective concept of
"most annoying bugs":
* [META] Windows Installer Most Annoying Bugs -
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41884
* [META] Report Builder most annoying bugs -
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61723
* [META] LibreOffice for Android most annoying bugs -
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84726
I'd like to review and retire these ones doing the following:
* Move their dependents to the obvious parent meta (if any: Android
ones should use the dedicated Android components)
* Review their importance if needed
* Close the metas as "invalid"
Any thoughts?
I'd like suggestions on how to deal with closed reports: I want to also
categorise closed reports properly for better stats, but I don't want to
be unnecessarily noisy to subscribed contributors, especially for bugs
that are long gone.
How do we do a mass change as silently as possible? E.g. replacing one
"blocks" value in many bugs in one go.
Cheers
--
Stéphane Guillou
Quality Assurance Analyst | The Document Foundation
Email:stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org
Mobile (France): +33 7 79 67 18 72
Matrix: @stragu:matrix.org
Fediverse: @str...@mastodon.indie.host
Web:https://stragu.gitlab.io/
