https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58434
--- Comment #17 from Harald Koester <harald.koes...@mail.de> --- Created attachment 112753 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=112753&action=edit More detailed information about these kind of special characters Meanwhile I found the following sentence in the help: “Field Shadings: Shows or hides field shadings in your document, including non-breaking spaces, custom hyphens, indexes, and footnotes.” If the function will be changed also this text has to be changed. So it seems that it was intended to use the field shading also for formatting marks and hence it would not be a bug in a narrower sense. But to my opinion it is still rather mistakable. So I would appreciate if formatting marks would be highlighted in a different way. In order to get an impression how the different non-printing characters and formatting marks are treated, I examined the current behaviour and created a list with the results. You can find this list inside a document which I will attach to this bug report. My impression is, that there is no clear direction how these special characters are treated. I think the list is not complete, because there are special characters which are used in languages which I do not know. In the list there are also some question marks where I did not know or examine the behaviour. Feel free if you like to complete or enhance the list. Hence the situation is a bit complicated, a more general approach should be considered. Therefore some questions should be answered. In the attached document I added a list with, what I think are the relevant questions together with some more aspects. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise