https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96336
V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #6 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> --- Yes, all of OPs observations are correct. There is inconsistency across the components in how the page background fill tool for bitmaps are structured. --Tab labels-- Area (Writer) vs. Background (Calc, Draw, Impress) --Dialog names-- Page Style (Writer, Calc) vs. Page Setup (Draw, Impress --w/ no Import) --Button lables-- Import graphic...(Writer) vs. Browse (Calc) **Draw and Impress are missing an import option button - that seems incorrect Possible that the dialogs really are different (Page Style vs. Page Setup), but believe they are all controlling the same page background fill attribute(s) of the internal and ODF document. So, IMHO the crux here is simple inconsistency of labeling in the UI. I also believe the handling in Writer's Format -> Page dialog: Area tab is incorrect label it should also be "Background" (for the page), but otherwise is the most complete and should be the model to bring the other dialogs and tabs consistent. Regards nomenclature: "Vector" based drawings, and "Raster" bitmaps are all "graphics", internally they are all processed into bitmap metafiles for rendering onto the drawing canvas. So we do not need to be too concerned with notation--so long as it is consistent. And so long as when saved to ODF or export to external format--the correct conversions are applied--mainly to preserve/control resolution where appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise