https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101252
Heiko Tietze <tietze.he...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|needsUXEval |easyHack, needsDevEval --- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze <tietze.he...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to lafeuil from comment #7) > ... I thought it is not very complicated to implement it. That might be true. But an alphabetical index and an user-defined index that can be sorted alphabetically adds confusion. In the long term we should come up with a better/easier solution. I have to admit that your workflow is still not entirely clear to me. The usual operation for footnotes is straightforward, so why do you add a ToC there (shouldn't it be restricted to the current page)? Anyway, the change is pretty simple and makes sense for the user-defined index, which has to be as flexible as possible. So I remove the needsUXEval and suggest to reuse what is there in the alphabetical index. Easyhack? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise