https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126608
--- Comment #50 from Todd <toddandma...@zoho.com> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #45) > Those discussions might be better suited for > the mailing lists or our other channels (IRC, Telegram). I think the issue here is that you do not get a good hearing when you report a bug, so you either give up or start these YUGE long dissertations. It seem that you get a knee jerk "NOTABUG" response and that is the end of it. In this bug report, I pointed out several bugs and got back use a different tool or use the tools provided, but not "that" tool. Since one tool worked, but another did not, it was not a bug and I just did not understand. RTFM. For instance, the style pop up at the bottom of the page where Landscape is actually Portrait. Format->Page->page is different that the side bar tool when selecting Landscape. (I can show you XML code as to what is different if you wish.) And my constant complaining about no Portrait in the styles selection. Another example of getting blown off when reporting a bug: Calc: print does not print unsaved cell https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125895 Resolved: NOT A BUG I reopened as an RFE Print/Export should close cells first https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125932 And then got a decent hearing and the bug was accepted. Are you sensing a pattern? That all being said, I adore Regina's proposal. I would love to test it, if you need a tester. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise